Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
The ITAT set aside the enhancement order issued by CIT(A) under s.251(2) regarding LTCG and denial of s.54F deduction on sale of gold, ornaments, and silver utensils. The Tribunal held that s.251(2) provisions are mandatory, requiring reasonable opportunity of show cause before enhancement, relying on precedents from SC and other ITAT benches. Despite Revenue's contention that the appellant had failed to appear when the case was called and opportunities were granted, the Tribunal determined that sufficient opportunity was not provided before enhancement. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits after providing fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
The ITAT set aside the enhancement order issued by CIT(A) under s.251(2) regarding LTCG and denial of s.54F deduction on sale of gold, ornaments, and silver utensils. The Tribunal held that s.251(2) provisions are mandatory, requiring reasonable opportunity of show cause before enhancement, relying on precedents from SC and other ITAT benches. Despite Revenue's contention that the appellant had failed to appear when the case was called and opportunities were granted, the Tribunal determined that sufficient opportunity was not provided before enhancement. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on merits after providing fair opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
