Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed a petition challenging an attachment order issued under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act for unpaid tax dues. The court found that the petitioner's claim of exclusive ownership through nomination was legally untenable, as nomination does not confer full title to property. Despite being nominated after the intestate death of Madhusudan, the petitioner held the property in trust for all legal heirs per succession laws. The purported transfer of interest to the petitioner by her sons in June 2017 occurred after tax arrears accrued (FY 2008-09 and 2012-13), making the undivided share of her son Jayesh subject to Section 38 of the Act.
The HC dismissed a petition challenging an attachment order issued under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act for unpaid tax dues. The court found that the petitioner's claim of exclusive ownership through nomination was legally untenable, as nomination does not confer full title to property. Despite being nominated after the intestate death of Madhusudan, the petitioner held the property in trust for all legal heirs per succession laws. The purported transfer of interest to the petitioner by her sons in June 2017 occurred after tax arrears accrued (FY 2008-09 and 2012-13), making the undivided share of her son Jayesh subject to Section 38 of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
