Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
The HC quashed the impugned order where a demand notice was challenged for improper service. Following Anhad Impex precedent, the Court found that notices uploaded under "additional notices and orders" on the GST portal were not easily accessible and thus escaped the petitioner's attention. While Section 169 permits service via the common portal, the Court emphasized that the purpose of service is to make assessees aware of communications. The Court directed respondents to allow the petitioner to file a response within 30 days and for the notice to be properly adjudicated. The HC left open the question of whether email notifications should accompany portal uploads to ensure effective service.
The HC quashed the impugned order where a demand notice was challenged for improper service. Following Anhad Impex precedent, the Court found that notices uploaded under "additional notices and orders" on the GST portal were not easily accessible and thus escaped the petitioner's attention. While Section 169 permits service via the common portal, the Court emphasized that the purpose of service is to make assessees aware of communications. The Court directed respondents to allow the petitioner to file a response within 30 days and for the notice to be properly adjudicated. The HC left open the question of whether email notifications should accompany portal uploads to ensure effective service.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
