Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of an appeal against Ext.P1 order under Section 107 of CGST/SGST Acts, 2017. The respondent had dismissed the appeal as time-barred, but the Court relied on Supreme Court precedent in Himachal Techno Engineers, which established that a three-month limitation period expires in the third month on the date corresponding to the commencement date, regardless of the actual number of days. Consequently, the Court held that the petitioner's appeal filed on 06-11-2023 was within the condonable period stipulated in Section 107 of the CGST/SGST Acts, and accordingly allowed the petition.
The HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of an appeal against Ext.P1 order under Section 107 of CGST/SGST Acts, 2017. The respondent had dismissed the appeal as time-barred, but the Court relied on Supreme Court precedent in Himachal Techno Engineers, which established that a three-month limitation period expires in the third month on the date corresponding to the commencement date, regardless of the actual number of days. Consequently, the Court held that the petitioner's appeal filed on 06-11-2023 was within the condonable period stipulated in Section 107 of the CGST/SGST Acts, and accordingly allowed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
