Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order and remanded the appeals for fresh consideration. The court held that Section 12AA independently empowers the Principal Commissioner to cancel registration granted under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act without requiring prior determination by the Assessing Authority. The Tribunal erroneously assumed that determination of relevant facts by an Assessing Officer was a prerequisite for the Principal Commissioner to exercise powers under Section 12AA. The statutory provisions do not support this interpretation, nor do they suggest that the Principal Commissioner's determination would bind the Assessing Officer's independent assessment. The questions of law were answered in favor of the department.
The HC set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order and remanded the appeals for fresh consideration. The court held that Section 12AA independently empowers the Principal Commissioner to cancel registration granted under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act without requiring prior determination by the Assessing Authority. The Tribunal erroneously assumed that determination of relevant facts by an Assessing Officer was a prerequisite for the Principal Commissioner to exercise powers under Section 12AA. The statutory provisions do not support this interpretation, nor do they suggest that the Principal Commissioner's determination would bind the Assessing Officer's independent assessment. The questions of law were answered in favor of the department.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
