Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee real estate developer, rejecting the Revenue's attempt to apply the Percentage Completion Method under Section 43CB. The Tribunal held that real estate developers appropriately follow AS-9 for revenue recognition, recognizing revenue only upon execution of conveyance deeds and transfer of possession. The ITAT distinguished between contractors (who provide construction services to clients) and developers (who build and sell property at their own risk), finding that the assessee's business model involved selling completed units rather than entering into construction contracts. The Tribunal also upheld the principle of consistency, noting the Revenue had accepted the same accounting method in previous assessment years with no material change in circumstances.
The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee real estate developer, rejecting the Revenue's attempt to apply the Percentage Completion Method under Section 43CB. The Tribunal held that real estate developers appropriately follow AS-9 for revenue recognition, recognizing revenue only upon execution of conveyance deeds and transfer of possession. The ITAT distinguished between contractors (who provide construction services to clients) and developers (who build and sell property at their own risk), finding that the assessee's business model involved selling completed units rather than entering into construction contracts. The Tribunal also upheld the principle of consistency, noting the Revenue had accepted the same accounting method in previous assessment years with no material change in circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.