Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing deductions under section 54B to the appellant. The Tribunal found that Khasra Girdawari records for Samvat 2074-2077 substantiated the appellant's claim that the transferred land was used for agricultural activities during the two years immediately preceding its sale. The records showed that the appellant and his brother, as joint Khatedars, had cultivated Bajra crops on 0.69 hectares of land during Samvat 2075-2077. As the Revenue failed to produce contradictory evidence against these official agricultural records, the ITAT confirmed the appellant's eligibility for section 54B deductions.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing deductions under section 54B to the appellant. The Tribunal found that Khasra Girdawari records for Samvat 2074-2077 substantiated the appellant's claim that the transferred land was used for agricultural activities during the two years immediately preceding its sale. The records showed that the appellant and his brother, as joint Khatedars, had cultivated Bajra crops on 0.69 hectares of land during Samvat 2075-2077. As the Revenue failed to produce contradictory evidence against these official agricultural records, the ITAT confirmed the appellant's eligibility for section 54B deductions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.