Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC determined that the Corporation's withholding of royalty payment from the petitioner's work bill was conditional. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit a complete claim with all information requested in Annexure 'R/B' within two months. Upon receipt of the complete claim, the Corporation must consider it in accordance with law and Standard Bidding Document Clause 35. The Court clarified that the prima-facie opinion expressed in paragraph 4 of the Letter (Annexure 'R/B') should not impede fair consideration of the claim. The Corporation agreed to consider the petitioner's GST claim amount subject to submission of complete documentation. Application disposed of.
The HC determined that the Corporation's withholding of royalty payment from the petitioner's work bill was conditional. The petitioner was granted liberty to submit a complete claim with all information requested in Annexure 'R/B' within two months. Upon receipt of the complete claim, the Corporation must consider it in accordance with law and Standard Bidding Document Clause 35. The Court clarified that the prima-facie opinion expressed in paragraph 4 of the Letter (Annexure 'R/B') should not impede fair consideration of the claim. The Corporation agreed to consider the petitioner's GST claim amount subject to submission of complete documentation. Application disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
