Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
The AAR ruled that Logskim's stipend disbursement to trainees does not qualify as a "pure agent" service under Rule 33 of CGST Rules, as they merely act as a conduit without procuring supplies or making payments to third parties. The authority found that Logskim failed to meet key conditions of Rule 33, particularly clauses (i) and (iii). Similarly, the sale of uniforms, shoes, and insurance premiums to industry partners, even at cost without markup, is taxable since "reimbursement at actuals" alone doesn't establish pure agent status. The AAR concluded that both the stipend amounts received and passed to trainees and the sale of items to industry partners are chargeable to tax under CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
The AAR ruled that Logskim's stipend disbursement to trainees does not qualify as a "pure agent" service under Rule 33 of CGST Rules, as they merely act as a conduit without procuring supplies or making payments to third parties. The authority found that Logskim failed to meet key conditions of Rule 33, particularly clauses (i) and (iii). Similarly, the sale of uniforms, shoes, and insurance premiums to industry partners, even at cost without markup, is taxable since "reimbursement at actuals" alone doesn't establish pure agent status. The AAR concluded that both the stipend amounts received and passed to trainees and the sale of items to industry partners are chargeable to tax under CGST/TNGST Acts, 2017.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
