TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
NCLAT dismissed the corporate debtor's appeal against admission of a Section 7 application filed by Punjab & Sind Bank. Despite the appellant submitting three settlement plans with different investors, all financial creditors (Punjab & Sind Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, and Punjab National Bank) unanimously rejected these proposals. YEIDA, claiming 751 crores, also opposed settlement. The Tribunal found that given the corporate debtor's substantial liabilities and opposition from homebuyers' associations, resolution through the statutory IBC framework was appropriate rather than settlement. The NCLAT confirmed the Section 7 application was filed within limitation by a duly authorized person and excluded the period from 29.07.2024 until judgment from the CIRP timeline.
NCLAT dismissed the corporate debtor's appeal against admission of a Section 7 application filed by Punjab & Sind Bank. Despite the appellant submitting three settlement plans with different investors, all financial creditors (Punjab & Sind Bank, Bank of Maharashtra, and Punjab National Bank) unanimously rejected these proposals. YEIDA, claiming 751 crores, also opposed settlement. The Tribunal found that given the corporate debtor's substantial liabilities and opposition from homebuyers' associations, resolution through the statutory IBC framework was appropriate rather than settlement. The NCLAT confirmed the Section 7 application was filed within limitation by a duly authorized person and excluded the period from 29.07.2024 until judgment from the CIRP timeline.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.