Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The AAAR set aside the impugned ruling dated 30.5.2024 and remanded the matter back to the GAAR for fresh decision. The case concerned whether services of preparing plans, estimates, and Draft Tender Plans for building work provided to the R&B department of Gujarat Government constituted "pure services" related to Panchayat or Municipality functions under Articles 243G or 243W of the Constitution. The AAAR determined it had authority to confirm or modify rulings under section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017, drawing parallels to similar provisions in the Central Excise Act and Finance Act, with support from Gujarat HC precedent in Commissioner of Central Excise vs Medico Labs.
The AAAR set aside the impugned ruling dated 30.5.2024 and remanded the matter back to the GAAR for fresh decision. The case concerned whether services of preparing plans, estimates, and Draft Tender Plans for building work provided to the R&B department of Gujarat Government constituted "pure services" related to Panchayat or Municipality functions under Articles 243G or 243W of the Constitution. The AAAR determined it had authority to confirm or modify rulings under section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017, drawing parallels to similar provisions in the Central Excise Act and Finance Act, with support from Gujarat HC precedent in Commissioner of Central Excise vs Medico Labs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
