Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The SC dismissed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Gujarat HC ruling due to an unexplained 292-day delay in filing. The underlying case concerned the Revenue's treatment of proceeds from shares of Sunrise Asian Ltd as unexplained income under s.68 rather than LTCG exempt under s.10(38). The HC had ruled in the assessee's favor, finding that exemption claims cannot be deemed bogus based on mere presumption when: (1) no evidence contradicted the assessee's position, (2) SEBI had not found the shares to be rigged, and (3) the assessee had held the shares for approximately two and a half years before selling them.
The SC dismissed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Gujarat HC ruling due to an unexplained 292-day delay in filing. The underlying case concerned the Revenue's treatment of proceeds from shares of Sunrise Asian Ltd as unexplained income under s.68 rather than LTCG exempt under s.10(38). The HC had ruled in the assessee's favor, finding that exemption claims cannot be deemed bogus based on mere presumption when: (1) no evidence contradicted the assessee's position, (2) SEBI had not found the shares to be rigged, and (3) the assessee had held the shares for approximately two and a half years before selling them.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
