Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Page of 4787
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95724 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that in cases of accommodation entries, additions should be limited to the profit element embedded in the bogus transactions rather than the entire transaction value. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer's addition of 10% on total sales and purchases unjustified, as it was made without proper investigation and solely based on the Verification Unit's report, which wasn't provided to the assessee. Following precedent from the Surat Bench in similar cases, the ITAT restricted the addition to 6% of the purchase amount (3,11,75,748) and 0.5% of sales amount (6,20,94,701), acknowledging that only real income after expense set-off can be taxed, not the substantial part of transactions.
The ITAT held that in cases of accommodation entries, additions should be limited to the profit element embedded in the bogus transactions rather than the entire transaction value. The Tribunal found the Assessing Officer's addition of 10% on total sales and purchases unjustified, as it was made without proper investigation and solely based on the Verification Unit's report, which wasn't provided to the assessee. Following precedent from the Surat Bench in similar cases, the ITAT restricted the addition to 6% of the purchase amount (3,11,75,748) and 0.5% of sales amount (6,20,94,701), acknowledging that only real income after expense set-off can be taxed, not the substantial part of transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4787
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
