Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that appellant's road construction activities qualify for exemption under Notification No.17/2005-ST regardless of whether roads were public or private, as the notification contains no such distinction. The tribunal set aside service tax demands related to road construction services. Regarding sale of land valued at Rs.48,17,022/- and amounts received prior to May 16, 2008 (when "supply of tangible goods service" was introduced), CESTAT remanded these issues for verification by the adjudicating authority. The tribunal set aside service tax demands along with interest and penalties, directing the adjudicating authority to re-quantify tax liability and reassess penalties based on findings. Appeal disposed of.
CESTAT ruled that appellant's road construction activities qualify for exemption under Notification No.17/2005-ST regardless of whether roads were public or private, as the notification contains no such distinction. The tribunal set aside service tax demands related to road construction services. Regarding sale of land valued at Rs.48,17,022/- and amounts received prior to May 16, 2008 (when "supply of tangible goods service" was introduced), CESTAT remanded these issues for verification by the adjudicating authority. The tribunal set aside service tax demands along with interest and penalties, directing the adjudicating authority to re-quantify tax liability and reassess penalties based on findings. Appeal disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
