Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The SC upheld that the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order 2012 has legal force through Section 11 of the MSMED Act 2006. While individual MSEs have no mandatory procurement right, government bodies have a statutory obligation to implement the 25% procurement mandate from MSEs. The Court directed the Review Committee to examine whether this 25% procurement would be independent of the 358 reserved items and take necessary compliance actions within 60 days. Additionally, the Court ruled that minimum turnover clauses in tenders cannot override the Procurement Policy and directed the Grievance Cell to establish appropriate limits for such clauses for MSEs within 60 days. Judicial review will primarily ensure proper functioning of statutory authorities.
The SC upheld that the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order 2012 has legal force through Section 11 of the MSMED Act 2006. While individual MSEs have no mandatory procurement right, government bodies have a statutory obligation to implement the 25% procurement mandate from MSEs. The Court directed the Review Committee to examine whether this 25% procurement would be independent of the 358 reserved items and take necessary compliance actions within 60 days. Additionally, the Court ruled that minimum turnover clauses in tenders cannot override the Procurement Policy and directed the Grievance Cell to establish appropriate limits for such clauses for MSEs within 60 days. Judicial review will primarily ensure proper functioning of statutory authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
