Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The SC upheld that the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order 2012 has legal force through Section 11 of the MSMED Act 2006. While individual MSEs have no mandatory procurement right, government bodies have a statutory obligation to implement the 25% procurement mandate from MSEs. The Court directed the Review Committee to examine whether this 25% procurement would be independent of the 358 reserved items and take necessary compliance actions within 60 days. Additionally, the Court ruled that minimum turnover clauses in tenders cannot override the Procurement Policy and directed the Grievance Cell to establish appropriate limits for such clauses for MSEs within 60 days. Judicial review will primarily ensure proper functioning of statutory authorities.
The SC upheld that the Public Procurement Policy for MSEs Order 2012 has legal force through Section 11 of the MSMED Act 2006. While individual MSEs have no mandatory procurement right, government bodies have a statutory obligation to implement the 25% procurement mandate from MSEs. The Court directed the Review Committee to examine whether this 25% procurement would be independent of the 358 reserved items and take necessary compliance actions within 60 days. Additionally, the Court ruled that minimum turnover clauses in tenders cannot override the Procurement Policy and directed the Grievance Cell to establish appropriate limits for such clauses for MSEs within 60 days. Judicial review will primarily ensure proper functioning of statutory authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
