Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT ruled that a Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor was non-maintainable as the majority of claimed defaults occurred during the COVID-19 protected period under Section 10A of IBC (March 15, 2020 to February 28, 2022). Following the Supreme Court's Ramesh Kymal precedent, defaults during this period cannot form the basis for CIRP initiation. After excluding these protected defaults, the remaining debt fell below the mandatory Rs. 1 Cr threshold required under Section 4. Additionally, the tribunal condemned the Operational Creditor's "rapacious and intimidatory conduct" in pursuing insolvency proceedings despite having received full payment under the Settlement Deed. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal allowed, and the Corporate Debtor released from CIRP.
NCLAT ruled that a Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor was non-maintainable as the majority of claimed defaults occurred during the COVID-19 protected period under Section 10A of IBC (March 15, 2020 to February 28, 2022). Following the Supreme Court's Ramesh Kymal precedent, defaults during this period cannot form the basis for CIRP initiation. After excluding these protected defaults, the remaining debt fell below the mandatory Rs. 1 Cr threshold required under Section 4. Additionally, the tribunal condemned the Operational Creditor's "rapacious and intimidatory conduct" in pursuing insolvency proceedings despite having received full payment under the Settlement Deed. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal allowed, and the Corporate Debtor released from CIRP.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
