Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Tribunal admitted an application under Section 94(1) of IBC against a Personal Guarantor despite no ongoing CIRP or liquidation against the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional's report confirmed undisputed debt of Rs. 9.63 Crore, default by the Personal Guarantor, and valid invocation of guarantee through Demand Notices under SARFAESI Act and Form-B notice by Canara Bank, which remained uncontested. The Tri determined that all conditions under Section 100 of IBC were satisfied, as the guarantor failed to provide evidence of payment or cancellation of guarantee. The application was found maintainable, and the Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated against the Personal Guarantor.
The Tribunal admitted an application under Section 94(1) of IBC against a Personal Guarantor despite no ongoing CIRP or liquidation against the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional's report confirmed undisputed debt of Rs. 9.63 Crore, default by the Personal Guarantor, and valid invocation of guarantee through Demand Notices under SARFAESI Act and Form-B notice by Canara Bank, which remained uncontested. The Tri determined that all conditions under Section 100 of IBC were satisfied, as the guarantor failed to provide evidence of payment or cancellation of guarantee. The application was found maintainable, and the Insolvency Resolution Process was initiated against the Personal Guarantor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
