Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT ruled that imported goods declared "NOT FOR RETAIL SALE" and sold to industrial consumers, whether directly or through distributors, are exempt from MRP/RSP-based assessment under Section 4A of Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found no evidence contradicting appellant's declaration that goods were meant for industrial consumers, making extended period invocation and penalties unsustainable. While the differential additional duty (CVD) demand based on MRP/RSP assessment was rejected, the matter regarding Special Additional Duty (SAD) was remanded to adjudicating authority for further examination due to unclear records about SAD payment at import and subsequent compliance with Notification 102/2007. The appeal was partially allowed through remand.
CESTAT ruled that imported goods declared "NOT FOR RETAIL SALE" and sold to industrial consumers, whether directly or through distributors, are exempt from MRP/RSP-based assessment under Section 4A of Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found no evidence contradicting appellant's declaration that goods were meant for industrial consumers, making extended period invocation and penalties unsustainable. While the differential additional duty (CVD) demand based on MRP/RSP assessment was rejected, the matter regarding Special Additional Duty (SAD) was remanded to adjudicating authority for further examination due to unclear records about SAD payment at import and subsequent compliance with Notification 102/2007. The appeal was partially allowed through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.