Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
HC set aside GST demand order dated 21.11.2024 for non-consideration of binding departmental circulars (No.200/12/2023-GST and No.236/30/2024-GST). Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration specifically accounting for these clarificatory circulars. Petitioner granted leave to file additional application demonstrating applicability of circular benefits to their case. The court determined that appellate remedy would be futile since the fundamental issue was non-consideration of binding administrative guidelines. Authority directed to pass fresh order after evaluating circular benefits as claimed by petitioner.
HC set aside GST demand order dated 21.11.2024 for non-consideration of binding departmental circulars (No.200/12/2023-GST and No.236/30/2024-GST). Matter remanded to adjudicating authority for fresh consideration specifically accounting for these clarificatory circulars. Petitioner granted leave to file additional application demonstrating applicability of circular benefits to their case. The court determined that appellate remedy would be futile since the fundamental issue was non-consideration of binding administrative guidelines. Authority directed to pass fresh order after evaluating circular benefits as claimed by petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
