Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
HC reviewed challenges to Garnishee Notice, Show Cause Notice, and notifications issued under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017. Multiple similar petitions were pending across jurisdictions, with Gauhati HC striking down the contested notifications. While Telangana HC ruled favorably based on SC's limitation extension order, that decision faces appeal in SC. Given the complex jurisdictional landscape and pending matters before SC, HC determined petitioner established grounds for both admission and interim relief. The substantive questions regarding validity of notifications and limitation period remain subject to final determination by SC. Petition disposed of with interim protection granted.
HC reviewed challenges to Garnishee Notice, Show Cause Notice, and notifications issued under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017. Multiple similar petitions were pending across jurisdictions, with Gauhati HC striking down the contested notifications. While Telangana HC ruled favorably based on SC's limitation extension order, that decision faces appeal in SC. Given the complex jurisdictional landscape and pending matters before SC, HC determined petitioner established grounds for both admission and interim relief. The substantive questions regarding validity of notifications and limitation period remain subject to final determination by SC. Petition disposed of with interim protection granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
