Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT quashed assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by ITO-4(1), Raipur due to invalid assumption of jurisdiction. The transfer of case from ITO-4(1), Kolkata to ITO-4(1), Raipur was held improper without requisite order u/s 127(2) from CIT, Kolkata-2. ITAT determined that under s.120, CIT Kolkata-2 lacked authority to transfer jurisdiction to an AO not subordinate to him. The claim based on order sheet noting dated 08.09.2014 regarding transfer pursuant to s.120 order was rejected. The assessment was invalidated as fundamental jurisdictional requirements under s.127 were not met. Appeal decided against Revenue.
ITAT quashed assessment order passed u/s 143(3) by ITO-4(1), Raipur due to invalid assumption of jurisdiction. The transfer of case from ITO-4(1), Kolkata to ITO-4(1), Raipur was held improper without requisite order u/s 127(2) from CIT, Kolkata-2. ITAT determined that under s.120, CIT Kolkata-2 lacked authority to transfer jurisdiction to an AO not subordinate to him. The claim based on order sheet noting dated 08.09.2014 regarding transfer pursuant to s.120 order was rejected. The assessment was invalidated as fundamental jurisdictional requirements under s.127 were not met. Appeal decided against Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.