Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held tax proceedings against a deceased sole proprietor cannot continue against legal heirs. Following SC precedent in Shabina Abraham, tax demands expire with proprietor's death. Legal heir lacked standing as no Rule 22 application was filed before proprietor's death to claim appeal rights. Appellant failed to provide evidence of succeeding father's business ownership. Death certificate confirmed proprietor's demise, rendering proceedings non-maintainable. Section 22 provisions for legal heir claims were not properly invoked within prescribed timeline. Appeal dismissed as proceedings cannot survive proprietor's death or transfer to heirs without proper succession documentation.
CESTAT held tax proceedings against a deceased sole proprietor cannot continue against legal heirs. Following SC precedent in Shabina Abraham, tax demands expire with proprietor's death. Legal heir lacked standing as no Rule 22 application was filed before proprietor's death to claim appeal rights. Appellant failed to provide evidence of succeeding father's business ownership. Death certificate confirmed proprietor's demise, rendering proceedings non-maintainable. Section 22 provisions for legal heir claims were not properly invoked within prescribed timeline. Appeal dismissed as proceedings cannot survive proprietor's death or transfer to heirs without proper succession documentation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.