Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC held that appellant was not liable for dishonored security deposit cheques totaling Rs.9,00,000 under Section 138 of NI Act. Court found appellant entitled to deduct unpaid rent and maintenance from security deposit before refund. Respondent failed to establish entire cheque amount as legally enforceable debt. Trial Court's judgment limiting compensation to Rs.3,00,000 with 6% interest was restored, setting aside appellate court and HC decisions. Rs.5,000 forfeited to State Exchequer, with default penalty of one year simple imprisonment. Evidence showed respondent had defaulted on vacating property, requiring execution proceedings for possession through police intervention.
SC held that appellant was not liable for dishonored security deposit cheques totaling Rs.9,00,000 under Section 138 of NI Act. Court found appellant entitled to deduct unpaid rent and maintenance from security deposit before refund. Respondent failed to establish entire cheque amount as legally enforceable debt. Trial Court's judgment limiting compensation to Rs.3,00,000 with 6% interest was restored, setting aside appellate court and HC decisions. Rs.5,000 forfeited to State Exchequer, with default penalty of one year simple imprisonment. Evidence showed respondent had defaulted on vacating property, requiring execution proceedings for possession through police intervention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
