Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
SC determined that a director who is not a signatory to a dishonored cheque cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the 1881 Act unless Section 141 requirements are met. Section 141(1) mandates two distinct conditions: the person must be both in charge of and responsible for company's business conduct when the offense occurred. The complaints failed to establish that the appellant was in charge of company business at the relevant time. Without meeting these twin requirements and absent being a cheque signatory, vicarious liability cannot be imposed on the director under Section 138. Appeal allowed, director absolved of liability.
SC determined that a director who is not a signatory to a dishonored cheque cannot be held liable under Section 138 of the 1881 Act unless Section 141 requirements are met. Section 141(1) mandates two distinct conditions: the person must be both in charge of and responsible for company's business conduct when the offense occurred. The complaints failed to establish that the appellant was in charge of company business at the relevant time. Without meeting these twin requirements and absent being a cheque signatory, vicarious liability cannot be imposed on the director under Section 138. Appeal allowed, director absolved of liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
