Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
ITAT ruled against PCIT's interpretation of depreciation computation under Section 32(1)(ii) and 43(6)(c). The tribunal rejected PCIT's method requiring brought forward additional depreciation from AY 2017-18 to be first reduced from opening WDV before computing current year's depreciation for AY 2018-19. ITAT affirmed depreciation must be calculated on WDV of block assets per prescribed rates, with WDV computation only adjusted for asset additions and disposals during the year. The tribunal found assessee's depreciation claim aligned with ITR utility format and Tax Audit Report requirements. Since no erroneous treatment prejudicial to revenue interest was established, assessee's appeal was allowed, invalidating revision under s.263.
ITAT ruled against PCIT's interpretation of depreciation computation under Section 32(1)(ii) and 43(6)(c). The tribunal rejected PCIT's method requiring brought forward additional depreciation from AY 2017-18 to be first reduced from opening WDV before computing current year's depreciation for AY 2018-19. ITAT affirmed depreciation must be calculated on WDV of block assets per prescribed rates, with WDV computation only adjusted for asset additions and disposals during the year. The tribunal found assessee's depreciation claim aligned with ITR utility format and Tax Audit Report requirements. Since no erroneous treatment prejudicial to revenue interest was established, assessee's appeal was allowed, invalidating revision under s.263.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
