Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT reversed additions made under s.69A based on seized digital ledger "Hazir Johri." The disputed ledger "Sanmati 1586" contained merged entries of multiple unrelated parties alongside assessee's transactions. Revenue authorities failed to provide concrete evidence linking assessee to all transactions or substantiate the nature of entries where assessee was named. No corroborative documentation like bills, vouchers, or stock registers established cash sales attribution to assessee. Following precedent where similar merged ledgers were deemed insufficient basis for additions, ITAT held that reliance on Hazir Johri software alone cannot sustain additions without supporting evidence. Assessee's explanation was considered plausible, and additions were deleted.
ITAT reversed additions made under s.69A based on seized digital ledger "Hazir Johri." The disputed ledger "Sanmati 1586" contained merged entries of multiple unrelated parties alongside assessee's transactions. Revenue authorities failed to provide concrete evidence linking assessee to all transactions or substantiate the nature of entries where assessee was named. No corroborative documentation like bills, vouchers, or stock registers established cash sales attribution to assessee. Following precedent where similar merged ledgers were deemed insufficient basis for additions, ITAT held that reliance on Hazir Johri software alone cannot sustain additions without supporting evidence. Assessee's explanation was considered plausible, and additions were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.