Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT determined appellant's promotional and marketing services to Air BNB Ireland qualified as export services, not intermediary services. The tribunal found no agent-principal relationship existed, as appellant operated as independent contractor on cost-plus markup basis, directly billing Air BNB Ireland. Key factors: appellant provided only main service without auxiliary services, held no direct contracts with Air BNB's customers, and subcontracting arrangements did not constitute intermediary status per CBIC circular. Revenue's failure to initiate Section 73 proceedings under Finance Act 1994 for service tax collection implicitly acknowledged export status. Tribunal directed refund of unutilized CENVAT credit, overturning original rejection.
CESTAT determined appellant's promotional and marketing services to Air BNB Ireland qualified as export services, not intermediary services. The tribunal found no agent-principal relationship existed, as appellant operated as independent contractor on cost-plus markup basis, directly billing Air BNB Ireland. Key factors: appellant provided only main service without auxiliary services, held no direct contracts with Air BNB's customers, and subcontracting arrangements did not constitute intermediary status per CBIC circular. Revenue's failure to initiate Section 73 proceedings under Finance Act 1994 for service tax collection implicitly acknowledged export status. Tribunal directed refund of unutilized CENVAT credit, overturning original rejection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.