Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT determined appellant's promotional and marketing services to Air BNB Ireland qualified as export services, not intermediary services. The tribunal found no agent-principal relationship existed, as appellant operated as independent contractor on cost-plus markup basis, directly billing Air BNB Ireland. Key factors: appellant provided only main service without auxiliary services, held no direct contracts with Air BNB's customers, and subcontracting arrangements did not constitute intermediary status per CBIC circular. Revenue's failure to initiate Section 73 proceedings under Finance Act 1994 for service tax collection implicitly acknowledged export status. Tribunal directed refund of unutilized CENVAT credit, overturning original rejection.
CESTAT determined appellant's promotional and marketing services to Air BNB Ireland qualified as export services, not intermediary services. The tribunal found no agent-principal relationship existed, as appellant operated as independent contractor on cost-plus markup basis, directly billing Air BNB Ireland. Key factors: appellant provided only main service without auxiliary services, held no direct contracts with Air BNB's customers, and subcontracting arrangements did not constitute intermediary status per CBIC circular. Revenue's failure to initiate Section 73 proceedings under Finance Act 1994 for service tax collection implicitly acknowledged export status. Tribunal directed refund of unutilized CENVAT credit, overturning original rejection.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.