Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
CESTAT determined appellant's service tax liability and Cenvat credit eligibility. Court held appellants were not providing branded services to subscribers, qualifying them for exemption under Notification 33/2012-ST. Extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable, resulting in demand restriction to normal limitation period and cancellation of Section 78 penalties. Regarding Cenvat credit, appellants entitled to credit of service tax paid by MSO, subject to Cenvat Credit Rules compliance, specifically the one-year time limit from document submission. Credits claimed beyond prescribed period were denied, following established precedent. Matter remanded to Original Authority for demand re-quantification, with appeals partially allowed.
CESTAT determined appellant's service tax liability and Cenvat credit eligibility. Court held appellants were not providing branded services to subscribers, qualifying them for exemption under Notification 33/2012-ST. Extended period of limitation was deemed inapplicable, resulting in demand restriction to normal limitation period and cancellation of Section 78 penalties. Regarding Cenvat credit, appellants entitled to credit of service tax paid by MSO, subject to Cenvat Credit Rules compliance, specifically the one-year time limit from document submission. Credits claimed beyond prescribed period were denied, following established precedent. Matter remanded to Original Authority for demand re-quantification, with appeals partially allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.