Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held disputes between partners of LLP and the LLP itself are arbitrable under the arbitration agreement in LLP Agreement, even when LLP is not a signatory. The First Schedule's provisions govern mutual rights and duties between LLP and partners, with Item 14 mandating arbitration for partner disputes. The dispute concerning partner expulsion necessarily involves examining injury to LLP's interests, making LLP a necessary party to arbitration proceedings. Court rejected respondents' objection that LLP was extraneous to LLP Agreement as untenable and frivolous, noting these objections appeared aimed at delaying arbitration. Application under Section 11 of Arbitration Act was disposed of, affirming arbitrability of the dispute including LLP as party.
HC held disputes between partners of LLP and the LLP itself are arbitrable under the arbitration agreement in LLP Agreement, even when LLP is not a signatory. The First Schedule's provisions govern mutual rights and duties between LLP and partners, with Item 14 mandating arbitration for partner disputes. The dispute concerning partner expulsion necessarily involves examining injury to LLP's interests, making LLP a necessary party to arbitration proceedings. Court rejected respondents' objection that LLP was extraneous to LLP Agreement as untenable and frivolous, noting these objections appeared aimed at delaying arbitration. Application under Section 11 of Arbitration Act was disposed of, affirming arbitrability of the dispute including LLP as party.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.