Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed order denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim under CGST Act. Following precedent in Sri Ganapathi Pandi Industries case, Court held that despite limitation under Section 16(4), petitioner entitled to claim ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 due to retrospective amendment introducing Section 16(5) effective from 01.07.2017. Department restrained from initiating proceedings against petitioner based on limitation grounds where claims filed before 30.11.2021. Amendment's retrospective application overrides original time limitation restrictions, enabling taxpayers to avail previously time-barred ITC claims within new prescribed timeframe. Petition allowed with costs.
HC quashed order denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim under CGST Act. Following precedent in Sri Ganapathi Pandi Industries case, Court held that despite limitation under Section 16(4), petitioner entitled to claim ITC for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21 due to retrospective amendment introducing Section 16(5) effective from 01.07.2017. Department restrained from initiating proceedings against petitioner based on limitation grounds where claims filed before 30.11.2021. Amendment's retrospective application overrides original time limitation restrictions, enabling taxpayers to avail previously time-barred ITC claims within new prescribed timeframe. Petition allowed with costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
