Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and government entity. Acknowledging State GST Department's confirmation of rate increase from 12% to 18%, court directed respondent to reimburse petitioner for differential GST amount of 6% for period January 1-24, 2022. Payment must be made within three months of certified order copy receipt. Non-compliance will attract 6% per annum interest from entitlement date. Court disposed petition despite alternative remedy availability under Arbitration Act, considering direct involvement of GST authorities and rate enhancement confirmation.
HC ruled on GST reimbursement dispute between petitioner and government entity. Acknowledging State GST Department's confirmation of rate increase from 12% to 18%, court directed respondent to reimburse petitioner for differential GST amount of 6% for period January 1-24, 2022. Payment must be made within three months of certified order copy receipt. Non-compliance will attract 6% per annum interest from entitlement date. Court disposed petition despite alternative remedy availability under Arbitration Act, considering direct involvement of GST authorities and rate enhancement confirmation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
