Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT held that when computing capital gains for inherited/gifted property acquired pre-1981, the "first year asset held" refers to original ownership by previous owner, not date of gift transfer. Assessee correctly computed indexed cost of acquisition from April 2001 base date. Regarding property valuation, comparative sale instances must consider full ownership rights - 25% undivided share properties require upward adjustment. AO's determination of indexed acquisition cost was reasonable after examining documentation and explanations. The assessment order represented a plausible interpretation that was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. PCIT's revision under s.263 was unsustainable. Assessee's appeal allowed.
ITAT held that when computing capital gains for inherited/gifted property acquired pre-1981, the "first year asset held" refers to original ownership by previous owner, not date of gift transfer. Assessee correctly computed indexed cost of acquisition from April 2001 base date. Regarding property valuation, comparative sale instances must consider full ownership rights - 25% undivided share properties require upward adjustment. AO's determination of indexed acquisition cost was reasonable after examining documentation and explanations. The assessment order represented a plausible interpretation that was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. PCIT's revision under s.263 was unsustainable. Assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.