Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT set aside penalty under s271DA for cash receipts exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs, finding reasonable cause in taxpayer's interpretation of s269ST's "single transaction" language. Taxpayer maintained proper documentation of agricultural sellers including Aadhar, land records and Form 60, with no evidence of tax evasion. Distinguished from s40A(3), s269SS and s269T which use "aggregate" terminology. Being first year of new provision, taxpayer's bona fide belief that limit applied per individual receipt rather than cumulative total was plausible. Following Supreme Court precedent that penalties are quasi-criminal requiring more than technical breach, ITAT deleted penalty noting proper accounting and absence of black money allegations.
ITAT set aside penalty under s271DA for cash receipts exceeding Rs. 2 lakhs, finding reasonable cause in taxpayer's interpretation of s269ST's "single transaction" language. Taxpayer maintained proper documentation of agricultural sellers including Aadhar, land records and Form 60, with no evidence of tax evasion. Distinguished from s40A(3), s269SS and s269T which use "aggregate" terminology. Being first year of new provision, taxpayer's bona fide belief that limit applied per individual receipt rather than cumulative total was plausible. Following Supreme Court precedent that penalties are quasi-criminal requiring more than technical breach, ITAT deleted penalty noting proper accounting and absence of black money allegations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.