Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
CESTAT held that imported Mixed Hydrocarbon Oil was correctly classified under CTI 27011990, not as Automotive Diesel Fuel under CTI 27101944. CRCL laboratory testing confirmed the product did not meet IS:1460:2005 standards for automotive diesel. The tribunal emphasized that classification burden lies with Revenue per SC precedent in H.P.L. Chemicals. Appellant's admission under investigation cannot alone determine classification without corroborating evidence. Department failed to substantiate misclassification allegations with legally admissible evidence. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the original classification order, confirming goods as Mixed Hydrocarbon Oil under CTI 27011990.
CESTAT held that imported Mixed Hydrocarbon Oil was correctly classified under CTI 27011990, not as Automotive Diesel Fuel under CTI 27101944. CRCL laboratory testing confirmed the product did not meet IS:1460:2005 standards for automotive diesel. The tribunal emphasized that classification burden lies with Revenue per SC precedent in H.P.L. Chemicals. Appellant's admission under investigation cannot alone determine classification without corroborating evidence. Department failed to substantiate misclassification allegations with legally admissible evidence. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the original classification order, confirming goods as Mixed Hydrocarbon Oil under CTI 27011990.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
