Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding import of contaminated Shell on Shrimps under Notification 32/1997-Cus. Though goods were found unsuitable for export due to Nitrofuran Metabolite AHD contamination, appellant had demonstrated compliance with Rule 8 of Customs Rules by subjecting goods to job work with clear export intent. Following precedent from BPL Display Devices Ltd case, tribunal held that customs duty cannot be demanded when goods become unfit due to unforeseen circumstances, provided importer had no intention to divert goods for other purposes. Appellant's request for goods destruction rather than disposal evidenced genuine export intent. Appeal allowed with no duty liability imposed.
CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding import of contaminated Shell on Shrimps under Notification 32/1997-Cus. Though goods were found unsuitable for export due to Nitrofuran Metabolite AHD contamination, appellant had demonstrated compliance with Rule 8 of Customs Rules by subjecting goods to job work with clear export intent. Following precedent from BPL Display Devices Ltd case, tribunal held that customs duty cannot be demanded when goods become unfit due to unforeseen circumstances, provided importer had no intention to divert goods for other purposes. Appellant's request for goods destruction rather than disposal evidenced genuine export intent. Appeal allowed with no duty liability imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
