Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding detained goods due to expired e-way bill during intra-state stock transfer. While authorities detained goods citing e-way bill expiration, petitioner demonstrated goods were part of legitimate stock transfer between units, not a sale transaction. Driver's delay was documented through contemporaneous letter explaining personal emergency. Court found no evidence of tax evasion intent, following SC precedent in Satyam Shivam Papers. Detention, seizure, and penalty were deemed unjustified as basic compliance requirements for intra-state transfer were met despite procedural lapse. HC emphasized substance over form, noting absence of fraudulent intent or revenue loss. Petition allowed with costs.
HC ruled in favor of petitioner regarding detained goods due to expired e-way bill during intra-state stock transfer. While authorities detained goods citing e-way bill expiration, petitioner demonstrated goods were part of legitimate stock transfer between units, not a sale transaction. Driver's delay was documented through contemporaneous letter explaining personal emergency. Court found no evidence of tax evasion intent, following SC precedent in Satyam Shivam Papers. Detention, seizure, and penalty were deemed unjustified as basic compliance requirements for intra-state transfer were met despite procedural lapse. HC emphasized substance over form, noting absence of fraudulent intent or revenue loss. Petition allowed with costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
