Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT ruled against additions made under section 153A for unsecured loans (s.68) and interest expense disallowance (s.37(1)) in a concluded assessment year. Following SC precedent in Abhisar Buildwell and Delhi HC in Pavitra Realcon, the Tribunal held that absent incriminating material discovered during search under s.132, AO lacks jurisdiction to reassess completed assessments. A statement under s.132(4) alone, without corroborating search evidence, is insufficient basis for assessment. Since the year in question was an unabated assessment with no incriminating evidence found during search, the additions were invalidated and ruled in assessee's favor.
ITAT ruled against additions made under section 153A for unsecured loans (s.68) and interest expense disallowance (s.37(1)) in a concluded assessment year. Following SC precedent in Abhisar Buildwell and Delhi HC in Pavitra Realcon, the Tribunal held that absent incriminating material discovered during search under s.132, AO lacks jurisdiction to reassess completed assessments. A statement under s.132(4) alone, without corroborating search evidence, is insufficient basis for assessment. Since the year in question was an unabated assessment with no incriminating evidence found during search, the additions were invalidated and ruled in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
