Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that ABET does not qualify as a "specified person" under section 13(3), invalidating the AO's disallowance of interest expenditure and lease rent under section 13(2). The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s order on these matters, dismissing Revenue's grounds 1-4. Regarding standard deduction under section 24, ITAT directed AO to disallow the 30% deduction claimed on house property income, reversing CIT(A)'s findings. On the issue of hybrid accounting for interest income, ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming that following cash system for Income from Other Sources was consistent with section 145 requirements. The Tribunal referenced precedents from Madras HC and Calcutta HC supporting income computation from trust property in normal commercial manner without section 14 provisions.
ITAT held that ABET does not qualify as a "specified person" under section 13(3), invalidating the AO's disallowance of interest expenditure and lease rent under section 13(2). The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s order on these matters, dismissing Revenue's grounds 1-4. Regarding standard deduction under section 24, ITAT directed AO to disallow the 30% deduction claimed on house property income, reversing CIT(A)'s findings. On the issue of hybrid accounting for interest income, ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, confirming that following cash system for Income from Other Sources was consistent with section 145 requirements. The Tribunal referenced precedents from Madras HC and Calcutta HC supporting income computation from trust property in normal commercial manner without section 14 provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
