Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and Tech. Mahindra Ltd.) from the comparable array in transfer pricing adjustment. Two entities (Infosys BPO and Tech Mahindra) underwent extraordinary acquisitions within the prescribed two-year period under Rule 10B(4) and failed to meet the related party transaction filter of less than 25%. The tribunal rejected Revenue's argument regarding turnover filter, citing Bombay HC precedent in Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd. case which had previously upheld exclusion based on turnover filter. ITAT directed TPO to recompute transfer pricing adjustment excluding all four entities, noting that assessee's IT-enabled services segment remained unchanged across assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14.
ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and Tech. Mahindra Ltd.) from the comparable array in transfer pricing adjustment. Two entities (Infosys BPO and Tech Mahindra) underwent extraordinary acquisitions within the prescribed two-year period under Rule 10B(4) and failed to meet the related party transaction filter of less than 25%. The tribunal rejected Revenue's argument regarding turnover filter, citing Bombay HC precedent in Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd. case which had previously upheld exclusion based on turnover filter. ITAT directed TPO to recompute transfer pricing adjustment excluding all four entities, noting that assessee's IT-enabled services segment remained unchanged across assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
