Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed conversion of shipping bills from DEEC scheme to drawback scheme, overturning the denial based on tariff classification dispute between CTH 6204 and 6104. Following earlier precedent in appellant's case, Tribunal held that proper verification of fabric nature and market value could determine appropriate drawback rate. Authority directed to calculate and sanction drawback claim within one month of order receipt. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication with specific instruction to process conversion request and determine applicable drawback under correct industry rate schedule. Original rejection based on fabric classification deemed unsustainable.
CESTAT allowed conversion of shipping bills from DEEC scheme to drawback scheme, overturning the denial based on tariff classification dispute between CTH 6204 and 6104. Following earlier precedent in appellant's case, Tribunal held that proper verification of fabric nature and market value could determine appropriate drawback rate. Authority directed to calculate and sanction drawback claim within one month of order receipt. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication with specific instruction to process conversion request and determine applicable drawback under correct industry rate schedule. Original rejection based on fabric classification deemed unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.