Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC ruled in favor of appellant, overturning insurer's repudiation of policy claim. While insurance contracts require uberrima fides and disclosure of material facts, failure to disclose existence of other insurance policies did not constitute material suppression in this case. Court noted insurer was aware of policyholder's existing higher-value policy with another company and still chose to issue coverage, demonstrating acceptance of insured's premium payment capacity. The insurer's knowledge of other policies and subsequent policy issuance negated their repudiation grounds. Material facts must influence prudent insurer's risk assessment, which was not established here. Appeal granted with policy benefits to be paid to appellant.
SC ruled in favor of appellant, overturning insurer's repudiation of policy claim. While insurance contracts require uberrima fides and disclosure of material facts, failure to disclose existence of other insurance policies did not constitute material suppression in this case. Court noted insurer was aware of policyholder's existing higher-value policy with another company and still chose to issue coverage, demonstrating acceptance of insured's premium payment capacity. The insurer's knowledge of other policies and subsequent policy issuance negated their repudiation grounds. Material facts must influence prudent insurer's risk assessment, which was not established here. Appeal granted with policy benefits to be paid to appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.