Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
SC ruled in favor of appellant, overturning insurer's repudiation of policy claim. While insurance contracts require uberrima fides and disclosure of material facts, failure to disclose existence of other insurance policies did not constitute material suppression in this case. Court noted insurer was aware of policyholder's existing higher-value policy with another company and still chose to issue coverage, demonstrating acceptance of insured's premium payment capacity. The insurer's knowledge of other policies and subsequent policy issuance negated their repudiation grounds. Material facts must influence prudent insurer's risk assessment, which was not established here. Appeal granted with policy benefits to be paid to appellant.
SC ruled in favor of appellant, overturning insurer's repudiation of policy claim. While insurance contracts require uberrima fides and disclosure of material facts, failure to disclose existence of other insurance policies did not constitute material suppression in this case. Court noted insurer was aware of policyholder's existing higher-value policy with another company and still chose to issue coverage, demonstrating acceptance of insured's premium payment capacity. The insurer's knowledge of other policies and subsequent policy issuance negated their repudiation grounds. Material facts must influence prudent insurer's risk assessment, which was not established here. Appeal granted with policy benefits to be paid to appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.