Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
HC dismissed the petition challenging GST demand for AY 2017-2020. Petitioner allegedly facilitated tax evasion by passing ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC). While petitioner claimed discharge of tax liability through ITC from supplier invoices, court found prima facie evidence of petitioner acting as accessory in passing ineligible ITC. Following precedent set in Sahyadri Industries Limited case, HC held that despite tax liability being met through ITC without cash payment, the transaction indicated fraudulent ITC passing scheme under CGST Act 2017 and TNGST Act 2017, warranting dismissal of relief sought.
HC dismissed the petition challenging GST demand for AY 2017-2020. Petitioner allegedly facilitated tax evasion by passing ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC). While petitioner claimed discharge of tax liability through ITC from supplier invoices, court found prima facie evidence of petitioner acting as accessory in passing ineligible ITC. Following precedent set in Sahyadri Industries Limited case, HC held that despite tax liability being met through ITC without cash payment, the transaction indicated fraudulent ITC passing scheme under CGST Act 2017 and TNGST Act 2017, warranting dismissal of relief sought.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
