Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed appellant's plea regarding duty exemption on goods transferred for job work. The court rejected the revenue neutrality argument based on CENVAT credit entitlement, holding that such interpretation would undermine the entire CENVAT credit scheme. The notification's benefits ceased once goods left the factory premises, even for job work. The concurrent findings by adjudicating authority, appellate authority, and Tribunal established that duty payment was mandatory at the time of clearance, regardless of subsequent use in production. The appellant's admission of revenue neutrality itself proved duty liability, as there was no valid justification for non-payment when sending goods for job work as required by law.
HC dismissed appellant's plea regarding duty exemption on goods transferred for job work. The court rejected the revenue neutrality argument based on CENVAT credit entitlement, holding that such interpretation would undermine the entire CENVAT credit scheme. The notification's benefits ceased once goods left the factory premises, even for job work. The concurrent findings by adjudicating authority, appellate authority, and Tribunal established that duty payment was mandatory at the time of clearance, regardless of subsequent use in production. The appellant's admission of revenue neutrality itself proved duty liability, as there was no valid justification for non-payment when sending goods for job work as required by law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.