Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal against revision proceedings under s.263 concerning 100% deduction claimed under s.80IC. PCIT's revision order was set aside as it failed to demonstrate how AO's inquiry was inadequate or unreasonable. AO had conducted proper verification by issuing notices, examining submissions and documentation before allowing the deduction claim. The assessment order's brevity alone does not justify revision jurisdiction when assessment records show due application of mind. ITAT held that AO's conclusion allowing 100% deduction was a plausible view that a prudent officer could take, and mere desire for re-verification cannot render the order erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue's interests under s.263.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal against revision proceedings under s.263 concerning 100% deduction claimed under s.80IC. PCIT's revision order was set aside as it failed to demonstrate how AO's inquiry was inadequate or unreasonable. AO had conducted proper verification by issuing notices, examining submissions and documentation before allowing the deduction claim. The assessment order's brevity alone does not justify revision jurisdiction when assessment records show due application of mind. ITAT held that AO's conclusion allowing 100% deduction was a plausible view that a prudent officer could take, and mere desire for re-verification cannot render the order erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue's interests under s.263.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
