Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed an appeal concerning pre-CIRP electricity dues, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over post-resolution plan disputes under IBC Section 60(5). The Tribunal held that IBC provisions supersede the Electricity Act 2003 per Section 238. The approved resolution plan's binding nature under Section 31(1) extinguished pre-CIRP dues since the appellant electricity company failed to file claims during CIRP. The Successful Resolution Applicant's (SRA) protest payment for electricity restoration was deemed compulsory for business continuation. The ruling established that creditors cannot demand pre-CIRP dues after resolution plan approval without having filed claims during the insolvency process, upholding IBC's primacy in resolving corporate insolvency matters.
NCLAT dismissed an appeal concerning pre-CIRP electricity dues, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over post-resolution plan disputes under IBC Section 60(5). The Tribunal held that IBC provisions supersede the Electricity Act 2003 per Section 238. The approved resolution plan's binding nature under Section 31(1) extinguished pre-CIRP dues since the appellant electricity company failed to file claims during CIRP. The Successful Resolution Applicant's (SRA) protest payment for electricity restoration was deemed compulsory for business continuation. The ruling established that creditors cannot demand pre-CIRP dues after resolution plan approval without having filed claims during the insolvency process, upholding IBC's primacy in resolving corporate insolvency matters.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
