Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed writ petition seeking quashing of multiple FIRs filed under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Petitioner collected substantial funds from prospective flat buyers without acquiring land for construction, violating RERA regulations. Investigation revealed petitioner misappropriated buyers' funds to purchase personal properties. Court determined prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent and deceptive inducement from transaction inception. Despite contractual nature of relationships, criminal charges were upheld due to distinct transactions warranting separate FIRs. Court found sufficient grounds to maintain criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery, rejecting petitioner's challenge to FIR validity.
HC dismissed writ petition seeking quashing of multiple FIRs filed under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Petitioner collected substantial funds from prospective flat buyers without acquiring land for construction, violating RERA regulations. Investigation revealed petitioner misappropriated buyers' funds to purchase personal properties. Court determined prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent and deceptive inducement from transaction inception. Despite contractual nature of relationships, criminal charges were upheld due to distinct transactions warranting separate FIRs. Court found sufficient grounds to maintain criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery, rejecting petitioner's challenge to FIR validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.