Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed writ petition seeking quashing of multiple FIRs filed under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Petitioner collected substantial funds from prospective flat buyers without acquiring land for construction, violating RERA regulations. Investigation revealed petitioner misappropriated buyers' funds to purchase personal properties. Court determined prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent and deceptive inducement from transaction inception. Despite contractual nature of relationships, criminal charges were upheld due to distinct transactions warranting separate FIRs. Court found sufficient grounds to maintain criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery, rejecting petitioner's challenge to FIR validity.
HC dismissed writ petition seeking quashing of multiple FIRs filed under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Petitioner collected substantial funds from prospective flat buyers without acquiring land for construction, violating RERA regulations. Investigation revealed petitioner misappropriated buyers' funds to purchase personal properties. Court determined prima facie evidence of fraudulent intent and deceptive inducement from transaction inception. Despite contractual nature of relationships, criminal charges were upheld due to distinct transactions warranting separate FIRs. Court found sufficient grounds to maintain criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery, rejecting petitioner's challenge to FIR validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
